Saturday, June 30, 2012

Young Athletes Face Unhealthy Food Choices, Parents Say

Young Athletes Face Unhealthy Food Choices, Parents Say

FRIDAY, June 29 (HealthDay News) -- Children who play organized sports often consume unhealthy foods and beverages, a new study finds.

University of Minnesota researchers interviewed the parents of 60 youth basketball players and found that the youngsters commonly had sweets, such as candy, ice cream and doughnuts; pizza; hot dogs; salty snacks, such as chips, nachos and cheese puffs; and soda and sports drinks.

The parents also reported frequent visits to fast-food restaurants when their children were playing sports.

Although the parents agreed that these foods and beverages are unhealthy, they said rushing to practices and games made them rely more on these types of products due to their convenience.

The researchers also found that parents had difficulty determining whether certain foods and drinks were healthy, and had doubts about whether it was feasible for concession stands at youth sports venues to offer healthy choices.

The study was published in the July/August issue of the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior.

"The food environment in youth sports exposes kids and their families to many unhealthful foods and beverages and few healthful options," principal investigator Toben Nelson said in a journal news release. "Youth who participate in sports spend considerable time in these activities outside of school, and these sports environments are likely to influence their eating behavior."

The researchers suggested many ways to promote healthy eating in children who play sports, including integrating nutrition education into youth sports programs and finding ways to improve the nutritional quality of food available at youth sports venues.

More information

The Nemours Foundation has more about feeding your child athlete.


Source: health.msn.com

Toddlers Are Happier to Give Than Receive: Study

FRIDAY, June 29 (HealthDay News) -- Giving treats to others makes toddlers happier than receiving treats, researchers report.

They also found that toddlers younger than 2 were happier when giving treats that belonged to them, rather than identical treats that didn't.

The team of three psychologists at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, gave toddlers some treats and a few minutes later asked the toddlers to give one of their treats to a puppet. The children were also given an extra treat and asked to give this to the puppet too.

The toddlers' reactions to these requests were videotaped and then rated for happiness. The researchers concluded that the toddlers showed greater happiness when they shared their own treat than when they shared the extra treat. This suggests that this behavior is emotionally rewarding for the children.

"People tend to assume that toddlers are naturally selfish," study lead author Lara Aknin said in a university news release. "These findings show that children are actually happier giving than receiving."

The study was published June 14 in the online journal PLoS One.

These and other findings from research with adults suggest that feeling good about helping others is a deeply ingrained part of human nature, the researchers said.

More information

The American Academy of Pediatrics offers an overview of toddler growth and development.

Original Source

Anthony Strano: This Is How To Start Your Morning

Anthony Strano: This Is How To Start Your Morning

Connection to our inner system of being is now a necessity as we are confronted with the spiraling disintegration of external systems. Systems that once provided security, zones of comfort, that today are battle zones as economic, social and political collapses -- minor or major -- confront our sensibilities daily. In many parts of the Middle East, Africa, Europe, Asia and the Americas, systems are in tatters. They are in states of dissolution because the value principles they once espoused with sincerity have turned into a glib adherence. Globally, there are far, far more talkers than walkers these days. The gap keeps widening and only a change in mentality can bridge the chasm between the saying and the doing, the ideal and the reality.

How to survive? However, it is not a matter of surviving but of living. Well-being for the individual, society and the planet is not a system of "rat race" tactics. Well-being is comprehensive, and does not espouse the "survival of the fittest" formula. Often, I am told: "It's a rat race." However, "I am not a rat!" I exclaim in reply.

We are the human family. We cannot resign ourselves to the maxim, "It's a dog-eat-dog world." Spirituality is the consciousness that takes all of us above such a mercenary level of existence. Spirituality gives us another set of eyes through which we cherish difference, cultivate happiness and have access to equal opportunity as the modus operandi for creating a livable life. Insecurities, on whatever level, create fears that generate ruthlessness in life that is contrary to our innate humanness. A society that instills and extols the value of a blind zealous ambition to achieve social glory in the eyes of the self and others -- either through name, money, race, religion, position, or power -- is dead. It becomes too noxious to keep existing. A crisis must happen, as it is the only possible means for exit.

There is now a call to reactivate the inner system of our being. The inner system has variously been called the soul or the spirit, but whatever word we may use, it pinpoints a core energy that is unique and natural, where our blueprint for living humanely resides. From time to time this system is forgotten in societies, so individuals appear whose task it is to reawaken its awareness. In history these are called the great teachers, the enlightened ones who bring us back to a state of remembrance of who we are and why we are.

The reminder that an inner system exists has always been necessary, which explains why throughout the course of time so many spiritual paths have emerged. However, it seems that now the universe is issuing an urgent mandate for everyone everywhere to remember the relevance of this spiritual system as the world's external systems are disintegrating at a colossal speed. A shower of power that relaxes, refreshes, recharges the discharged, damaged battery of our being is necessary. Someone may think more than just a shower is needed, that actually a torrent is required! Yes, we need a lot of inner power; however, it's essential to start gently. Too much too soon can be counterproductive. Starting with a little recharging each day can slowly and gradually empower our being. The first step for this is silence. All new things begin from a reflective space.

Many are seeking silence, a space of quietness where the self can meet the self . Meditation is viewed more and more as a genuine method for emotional, mental and physical well-being. To release stress, anxiety, and bad feelings, and to be at true peace with the self is the basis for functioning in the outer world of relationships. External systems start to be healed, start to rejuvenate when the internal system of each individual begins to resurrect. We reach the inside of ourselves through silence.

To take time out for silence on a daily basis becomes a smart method to facilitate the change from survival mode to living mode. Some ask what silence is. Here are a few possible perspectives:

  1. A place of quarantine: to recognize the germs of resentments, tensions, and pressures, and then decide to clean them out of our systems. Spiritual immunization on a daily basis.
  2. A place of deep rest where, in that quietness, we rest both physically and mentally -- otherwise, when we push mind and body to extremes, they start to dysfunction.
  3. A place of peace where there is contentment and ease, which gives rise to a greater clarity in my thoughts. A clarity that facilitates appropriate responses to people and situations rather than knee-jerk reactions.
  4. A place of grace where connection with the divine assists regeneration.

This inner place of renewal can be created by practicing four steps each day. (Of course, there may be other steps, but just to keep things manageable I have written about four):

1) Each Morning: Awake and Appreciate.

On awakening, take the self out of the bedroom because the vibrations of sleep may put one back to sleep if trying to meditate. Sitting in a quiet corner, I create my first thoughts: "Gently, lovingly, I connect with my soul-self. I am a being of peace and harmony. I appreciate this new day of my life, for there will be fresh opportunities and new learning. I am at peace with myself. I am peace." Taking this shower of positive thoughts in the morning, I am empowered for the day. Length of time in meditation depends on the individual, but most important is complete concentration, not to be distracted by anything, otherwise the energy disperses and the empowering does not take place. One can gently repeat the same thoughts as often as one needs and then come to a stillness where thinking is not necessary. That stillness showers the self with great inner serenity.

2) Daytime: Stop and Link Six or Seven Times.

Take time to create time, even just a minute. For a minute or even 30 seconds, I stop and link in silence to my inner self. With a breath, relax, slowly concentrating on these thoughts: "I relax. I am peaceful... calm... free. I am peaceful. I relax. I am peace." When these thoughts seep into my consciousness, it eases tension. Repeating these thoughts slowly and deeply and becoming stil,l I can feel that shower of peaceful power inside. If done with deep attentiveness and ease, this exercise removes fatigue and refreshes. It's a mind nap that restores energy, especially when one can hold the stillness during after the thoughts.

3) Daytime: Check, Change and Enjoy.

Check habitual negative reactions such as anxiety, anger, labeling and critical conclusions about the self or others. Discern. I dialogue with the self: "Take another route, as you know such thoughts and attitudes entangle you in the same mindset over and over again. Today I will do myself a great favor and stop this." Decide, for without determined decisions, nothing will change for the better. Consistent mindfulness changes self-sabotaging patterns and new patterns of respectfulness create joy in me and others.

4) Each Evening: Evaluate and Rest.

For a deep and relaxing sleep, what can help is to assess the day and ask the self two questions:

  1. What specific thing did I do better today?
  2. What specific thing could have I done better?

So one hand, appreciate the changes in the self, while simultaneously watching out for improvement. Both are necessary for mature and balanced progress. Going too much one way or the other one can become unrealistic -- either becoming too hard on the self, or thinking, "I have changed enough, let others do it now!"

After this evaluation I become silent, connecting to my inner system, to that original serenity of self. Going beyond thoughts, beyond the day and remaining in the awareness of "I am." In this evening meditation, we use "om shanti." Om means, "I am a soul. I am peace." This "I am" consciousness anchors me in the present -- no deflections to past or future, but centered in this moment of time. Such anchoring in the moment releases all tensions, and peace flows through all my being. In this state of total relaxation I am ready for a good night's sleep. The "om shanti" meditation can also be used first thing in the morning, and also at the minute stops during the day.

This exercise should be done not in the bedroom but in the same meditation corner as the morning. It's the final shower of the day. Our last thought of the day is linked to the first thought of the next day. I go to sleep clean, I will wake up clean.

Positive results are simply a matter of consistent practice. So to take showers of positive thoughts and practices, create a better me and consequently a better friend, a better colleague and a better person to others.

To finish with the words of one 96-year-old yogi from India, Dadi Janki, who at the very beginning of my journey 35 years ago gave me this simple but clear direction:

What is the difference between peace and silence?
Peace is something we want inside. Silence is when we leave the world outside, to go inside. When we go inside we are able to find the peace that we have lost. We have not actually lost peace but we have forgotten that it is inside. Only through silence can we find it again. It's a daily journey of stopping, becoming quiet and remembering.

Her words reminded me of the meaning of the Greek word for truth "alithea," which literally means "not to forget" -- each day, to remember who, where and why we are. This is the mindfulness that keeps us in the right space and generates confidence irrespective of what is happening around us. In silence, we are in a state of remembering. That remembrance becomes experience, which creates the energy to renew, heal, reconcile, hope and envision.

For Just-a Minute meditations: www.just-a-minute.org

For more by Anthony Strano, click here.

For more on meditation, click here.


Source: www.huffingtonpost.com

Friday, June 29, 2012

Why Some People Lose Weight So Easily

It is sad when you see your friends or family who find it easy to lose weight. But as for you, it is a different case. Well, I hope this article will shed some lights on the existing predominant thinking on weight loss efforts.

The thing that you should remember about weight loss (well, actually there’s about fifty “things” to remember), is that everyone’s body and motivation is different.  So, whatever weight loss tips may work for Mandy over on Moon Street, might not work for Simon over at Schuster Avenue.  Maybe “Mandy’s” only seventeen and Simon is seventy.  Or Simon might have had a kidney removed two years before.  Or maybe Mandy’s just plain blessed with great genes.

By now you’ve probably heard everything that you possibly can about effective weight loss.  Diets that let you eat whatever sweet you want. Diets that allow you to eat as much meat as you want –as long as you stay away from those dreaded (gasp!) vegetables.  Diets that let you eat anything and everything you desire, as long as you say a personal mantra at least 3 times a day.

Exercise or fitness for weight loss combined with dieting, leads to more weight loss than any other weight loss program. This does not imply that exercise or fitness for weight loss, alone, is worthless. Physical fitness for weight loss is certainly good for you, and is more effective in reshaping your body than it is for shedding flab. Exercise or fitness for weight loss helps build muscles, and muscles burn more calories for fuel.

Some people rely on anti-appetite (anorectic drugs). These weight loss tablets includes amphetamine, phentermine, fenfluramine etc. Although it is not clear how these medications work, but they are believed to have a direct effect on the satiety center located in the brain, as a result of which, the appetite is suppressed. These drugs may yield some positive results in the beginning, but soon give rise to dangerous side effects. Most of these weight loss tablets are banned in the United States and Canada.

I found on article that have expanded more ways to lose weight. Maybe you may find it helpful.

Treatments for Back and Other Acne

Acne is a common health condition that predominantly affects the skin, and skin with sebaceous (fat excreting) follicles. Acne inflicts itself mainly on the adolescents, due to an increase of testosterone in the body. There are two variations of acne; the inflammatory and non-inflammatory and it tend to attack the face, chest and back. Original article

Residents as Good as Fully Trained Docs if Properly Supervised: Study

Residents as Good as Fully Trained Docs if Properly Supervised: Study

FRIDAY, June 29 (HealthDay News) -- Although they are still in training, medical residents who are well supervised provide care that's as good as care provided by fully trained doctors, according to a new study.

Researchers from the University of Amsterdam and University of California, Los Angeles, reviewed nearly 100 articles on residency training and patient treatment published over the course of seven years. Residents are typically graduates of medical school who are receiving an additional three or more years of training in a specialty.

The review of the research found the majority of studies indicated that patient care provided by medical residents is safe and equal in quality to the care provided by fully trained doctors. They noted the teachings of their supervisors balanced the residents' lack of experience.

"A minority of results found some negative patient outcomes and several studies found that patient outcomes improved throughout the residency period," study author Renee van der Leeuw said in a journal news release. "We would recommend that for all residents, adequate supervision and evaluation, plus extra time to perform operations, is essential to maintain patient care."

The review was published in BMC Medicine.

More information

The American Medical Association provides more information on the role of residents in patient care.


Source: health.msn.com

Gene Boosts Tomato's Color, But May Make It Less Tasty

Gene Boosts Tomato's Color, But May Make It Less Tasty

FRIDAY, June 29 (HealthDay News) -- The gene mutation that makes a tomato uniformly red is the same trait that reduces its sweetness, researchers have found.

A team from the Boyce Thompson Institute (BTI) for Plant Research at Cornell University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the University of California, Davis discovered that the mutation, which is found in most supermarket tomatoes, reduces the amount of sugar, carbohydrates and carotenoids in the fruit.

"Practically, it is a very important trait," one of the study's senior authors, James Giovannoni, a plant molecular biologist with BTI and the USDA Agricultural Research Service, said in a Cornell news release. "It's a gene that, whether you realize it or not, most of your tomatoes have." But this trait also cuts the tomatoes' levels of sugars and nutrients.

Naturally ripened tomatoes have uneven patches of darker green and different shades of red. In the 1920s, however, commercial breeders found a natural mutation in tomatoes that causes them to ripen evenly from one shade of green to one shade of red. This mutation, the researchers explained, is evident in most tomatoes sold in grocery stores.

In conducting the study, the scientists pinpointed the location of the "uniform-ripening" gene. Using this location, the researchers uncovered the gene coding for the protein that controls photosynthesis levels in tomatoes.

Although leaves are the primary site of photosynthesis in plants, the study authors pointed out that developing tomato fruit can contribute up to 20 percent of their own photosynthesis, producing high sugar and nutrient levels when fully ripe. The uniform-ripening mutation, however, removes this protein, which reduces the tomatoes' sugar levels, they found.

"This is an unintended consequence," noted Giovannoni. "Producers currently don't get a penny more for [flavor] quality."

Producers who care more about taste than appearance should ensure their plants are mutation free, the researchers suggested in the report published in the June 29 issue of the journal Science.

The study "is a rare chance to translate scientific findings to the real world," said Ann Powell, a research biochemist who led the UC Davis team's efforts on the research. "It provides a strategy to re-capture quality characteristics that had been unknowingly bred out of modern cultivated tomatoes," she noted in the news release.

More information

Cornell University has more about plant breeding and genetics.


Source: health.msn.com

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Important Tips on How to Get Rid of Acne Quickly

Do you want to get rid of acne quickly? Acne is a medical skin problem which is seen among all teens and at times even lasts for years. It is one of the common skin diseases that outbreak pimples and cysts mainly on the face, arms, back and chest. Acne is so common now that it is considered as a normal part of growth in an individual. Original article

Supreme Court Backs Much of Controversial Health Reform Law

Supreme Court Backs Much of Controversial Health Reform Law

THURSDAY, June 28 (HealthDay News) -- Surprising many legal scholars, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld on Thursday the constitutionality of most of the controversial health reform law that requires almost all Americans to have health insurance or pay a penalty in the form of a tax.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the signature legislative achievement of President Barack Obama's administration, has been fiercely debated since its inception in March 2010. On one side of the argument have been many Democrats, who view the law as the first substantive legal attempt to greatly expand the number of insured Americans while improving health care and attempting to contain medical costs. On the other side have been many Republicans, who view the measure as an unprecedented intrusion into the private lives of citizens by telling them they have to buy a certain product -- in this case, health insurance.

Chief Justice John Roberts announced the court's complicated 5-to-4 decision that allows the law to proceed with its goal of covering more than 30 million uninsured Americans.

The Associated Press reported that the court did have some concerns with the law's expansion of Medicaid, the government-funded insurance program for low-income Americans. But the court said the expansion could go forward as long as the federal government doesn't threaten to withhold states' entire Medicaid allotment if they don't take part in the law's extension, the news service said.

The court's four liberal justices, Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, joined Roberts in the decision. Conservative justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas voted against the law.

The law set in motion a series of reforms designed to extend health coverage to more than 30 million uninsured Americans. It seeks to accomplish these goals in several ways. More lower-income people will be allowed to enroll in Medicaid, while other uninsured individuals can buy coverage through new state health insurance exchanges. Some people who buy coverage may qualify for tax credits.

The 2010 law's most controversial component -- and one of the key targets of the Supreme Court's scrutiny -- requires almost all Americans to maintain health insurance coverage or pay a penalty in the form of a tax.

The law also aims to improve the quality and efficiency of health care. For example, there are programs to improve care coordination and reduce fraud and abuse in Medicare, the government-run insurance program for older and disabled Americans.

A number of the law's most popular provisions are already in effect. For instance, parents in private insurance plans that offer dependent coverage can keep their adult children on the plan up to age 26. And most plans must now cover preventive health screenings, such as mammograms and colonoscopies, at no out-of-pocket cost to the patient.

Core elements of the law -- such as expanding Medicaid, establishing the state health insurance exchanges and requiring people to have coverage or pay a penalty, known as the "individual mandate" -- aren't scheduled to take effect until 2014.

Reaction to the court's decision was swift and divided.

Dr. Jeremy Lazarus, president of the American Medical Association, said his group "has long supported health insurance coverage for all, and we are pleased that this decision means millions of Americans can look forward to the coverage they need to get healthy and stay healthy.

"This decision protects important improvements, such as ending coverage denials due to pre-existing conditions and lifetime caps on insurance, and allowing the 2.5 million young adults up to age 26 who gained coverage under the law to stay on their parents' health insurance policies," Lazarus said in a news release. "The expanded health care coverage upheld by the Supreme Court will allow patients to see their doctors earlier rather than waiting for treatment until they are sicker and care is more expensive. The decision upholds funding for important research on the effectiveness of drugs and treatments and protects expanded coverage for prevention and wellness care, which has already benefited about 54 million Americans."

American Heart Association CEO Nancy Brown said the court's decision "will benefit America's heart health for decades to come. Questions about the Affordable Care Act's constitutionality have overshadowed the law's progress. With this ruling, that uncertainty has finally been put to rest.

"By upholding the law, the nation's highest court has sent a clear message that patients should be the first priority in an ever-changing health care arena. The court's action in support of the ACA helps remind us what's really important -- enabling all Americans to obtain affordable, quality health care," she said in a news release.

Democrats applauded the court's decision, while Republicans were disappointed.

At a midday press conference, President Obama, one of the law's architects who had succeeded with health care reform where predecessors as far back as Franklin Roosevelt had failed, said: "Today I am as confident as ever that when we look back five years from now, or 10 years from now, or 20 years from now, we will be better off because we had the courage to pass this law and keep moving forward."

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said in a speech on the Senate floor after the ruling: "No longer will Americans be a heart attack or a car crash away from bankruptcy. No longer will Americans live in fear of losing their health insurance because they lose their job," the Washington Post reported.

Congressional Republicans and GOP presidential challenger Mitt Romney have pledged to try to repeal the law after the November elections.

"What the court did not do in its last day in session, I will do on the first day as president of the United States. And that is, I will act to repeal 'Obamacare,'" Romney said after the decision was announced, ABC News reported.

Polls have shown that Americans remain sharply divided over the health care law. But a Harris Interactive/HealthDay poll in January found that an increasing number of Americans were slowly starting to embrace some key components of the legislation.

To be sure, Americans remain divided over the legislation, with slightly more than one-third (36 percent) of adults saying they wanted the law repealed and 21 percent saying they wanted it to remain as is. Another 25 percent said they'd like to see only certain elements of the law modified, the poll found.

"The public is still divided, mainly on partisan lines, as to whether to implement or repeal all, parts, or none of the health care reform bill," said Harris Poll Chairman Humphrey Taylor.

The poll found that support for the legislation broke down along party lines. Almost two-thirds of Republicans (63 percent) said they wanted the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act repealed, compared to 9 percent of Democrats.

But while respondents were split about the law as a whole, many strongly supported key elements of the bill, with 71 percent of those polled now backing the provision that prevents insurance companies from denying coverage to those already sick, for example.

The notable exception remains the individual mandate [the requirement that all adults purchase health insurance], "which remains deeply unpopular," Taylor said.

In February 2011, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that savings from the Affordable Care Act would cut the federal deficit by $210 billion during the next decade.

The law's supporters argue that without the requirement that people have insurance coverage while they're healthy, there won't be enough money in the risk pool to pay to take care of them when the need for health care eventually -- and inevitably -- arises.

"If people don't feel like paying, then get sick and go to the emergency room or the hospital, those people's costs will be added on to our insurance bills as they are today, which makes it much more expensive," said John Rother, president of the National Coalition on Health Care, which works to achieve reform of the U.S. health-care system.

But opponents say that the cost-cutting provisions probably won't work.

Devon Herrick, a health economist at the free-market National Center for Policy Analysis, said the law set up a "slippery slope" that will increase costs, not lower them.

"If Congress and company have the legal authority to decide the minimum coverage you must have, all manner of lobbyists and special interests and providers for specific diseases will descend on Washington and state capitals, as they always have, to make sure that their respective services are covered by that mandate," Herrick said.

In the two years since its passage, the Affordable Care Act has been the target of multiple lawsuits, with a handful of cases working their way through the federal appellate court system before the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in March.

More information

The Kaiser Family Foundation has a primer on the Supreme Court's review of the health-care reform law.

SOURCES: Humphrey Taylor, chairman, The Harris Poll; John Rother, president of the National Coalition on Health Care; Devon Herrick, health economist, the National Center for Policy Analysis; American Medical Association, news release, June 28, 2012; American Heart Association, news release, June 28, 2012; Associated Press; Washington Post; ABC News


Source: health.msn.com

Supreme Court Backs Much of Controversial Health Reform Law

THURSDAY, June 28 (HealthDay News) -- Surprising many legal scholars, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld on Thursday the constitutionality of most of the controversial health reform law that requires almost all Americans to have health insurance or pay a penalty in the form of a tax.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the signature legislative achievement of President Barack Obama's administration, has been fiercely debated since its inception in March 2010. On one side of the argument have been many Democrats, who view the law as the first substantive legal attempt to greatly expand the number of insured Americans while improving health care and attempting to contain medical costs. On the other side have been many Republicans, who view the measure as an unprecedented intrusion into the private lives of citizens by telling them they have to buy a certain product -- in this case, health insurance.

Chief Justice John Roberts announced the court's complicated 5-to-4 decision that allows the law to proceed with its goal of covering more than 30 million uninsured Americans.

The Associated Press reported that the court did have some concerns with the law's expansion of Medicaid, the government-funded insurance program for low-income Americans. But the court said the expansion could go forward as long as the federal government doesn't threaten to withhold states' entire Medicaid allotment if they don't take part in the law's extension, the news service said.

The court's four liberal justices, Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, joined Roberts in the decision. Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented, the AP reported.

The law set in motion a series of reforms designed to extend health coverage to more than 30 million uninsured Americans. It seeks to accomplish these goals in several ways. More lower-income people will be allowed to enroll in Medicaid, while other uninsured individuals can buy coverage through new state health insurance exchanges. Some people who buy coverage may qualify for tax credits.

The 2010 law's most controversial component -- and one of the key targets of the Supreme Court's scrutiny -- requires almost all Americans to maintain health insurance coverage or pay a penalty in the form of a tax.

The law also aims to improve the quality and efficiency of health care. For example, there are programs to improve care coordination and reduce fraud and abuse in Medicare, the government-run insurance program for older and disabled Americans.

A number of the law's most popular provisions are already in effect. For instance, parents in private insurance plans that offer dependent coverage can keep their adult children on the plan up to age 26. And most plans must now cover preventive health screenings, such as mammograms and colonoscopies, at no out-of-pocket cost to the patient.

Core elements of the law -- such as expanding Medicaid, establishing the state health insurance exchanges and requiring people to have coverage or pay a penalty, known as the "individual mandate" -- aren't scheduled to take effect until 2014.

Reaction to the court's decision was swift and divided.

Dr. Jeremy Lazarus, president of the American Medical Association, said his group "has long supported health insurance coverage for all, and we are pleased that this decision means millions of Americans can look forward to the coverage they need to get healthy and stay healthy.

"This decision protects important improvements, such as ending coverage denials due to pre-existing conditions and lifetime caps on insurance, and allowing the 2.5 million young adults up to age 26 who gained coverage under the law to stay on their parents' health insurance policies," Lazarus said in a news release. "The expanded health care coverage upheld by the Supreme Court will allow patients to see their doctors earlier rather than waiting for treatment until they are sicker and care is more expensive. The decision upholds funding for important research on the effectiveness of drugs and treatments and protects expanded coverage for prevention and wellness care, which has already benefited about 54 million Americans."

American Heart Association CEO Nancy Brown said the court's decision "will benefit America's heart health for decades to come. Questions about the Affordable Care Act's constitutionality have overshadowed the law's progress. With this ruling, that uncertainty has finally been put to rest.

"By upholding the law, the nation's highest court has sent a clear message that patients should be the first priority in an ever-changing health care arena. The court's action in support of the ACA helps remind us what's really important -- enabling all Americans to obtain affordable, quality healthcare," she said in a news release.

Democrats applauded the court's decision, while Republicans were disappointed.

"No longer will Americans be a heart attack or a car crash away from bankruptcy," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said in a speech on the Senate floor Thursday after the ruling, the Washington Post reported. "No longer will Americans live in fear of losing their health insurance because they lose their job."

Congressional Republicans and GOP presidential challenger Mitt Romney have pledged to try and repeal the law after the November elections.

Polls have shown that Americans remain sharply divided over the health care law. But a Harris Interactive/HealthDay poll in January found that an increasing number of Americans were slowly starting to embrace some key components of the legislation.

To be sure, Americans remain divided over the legislation, with slightly more than one-third (36 percent) of adults saying they wanted the law repealed and 21 percent saying they wanted it to remain as is. Another 25 percent said they'd like to see only certain elements of the law modified, the poll found.

"The public is still divided, mainly on partisan lines, as to whether to implement or repeal all, parts, or none of the health care reform bill," said Harris Poll Chairman Humphrey Taylor.

The poll found that support for the legislation broke down along party lines. Almost two-thirds of Republicans (63 percent) said they wanted the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act repealed, compared to 9 percent of Democrats.

But while respondents were split about the law as a whole, many strongly supported key elements of the bill, with 71 percent of those polled now backing the provision that prevents insurance companies from denying coverage to those already sick, for example.

The notable exception remains the individual mandate [the requirement that all adults purchase health insurance], "which remains deeply unpopular," Taylor said.

In February 2011, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that savings from the Affordable Care Act would cut the federal deficit by $210 billion during the next decade.

The law's supporters argue that without the requirement that people have insurance coverage while they're healthy, there won't be enough money in the risk pool to pay to take care of them when the need for health care eventually -- and inevitably -- arises.

"If people don't feel like paying, then get sick and go to the emergency room or the hospital, those people's costs will be added on to our insurance bills as they are today, which makes it much more expensive," said John Rother, president of the National Coalition on Health Care, which works to achieve reform of the U.S. health-care system.

But opponents say that the cost-cutting provisions probably won't work.

Devon Herrick, a health economist at the free-market National Center for Policy Analysis, said the law set up a "slippery slope" that will increase costs, not lower them.

"If Congress and company have the legal authority to decide the minimum coverage you must have, all manner of lobbyists and special interests and providers for specific diseases will descend on Washington and state capitals, as they always have, to make sure that their respective services are covered by that mandate," Herrick said.

In the two years since its passage, the Affordable Care Act has been the target of multiple lawsuits, with a handful of cases working their way through the federal appellate court system before the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in March.

More information

The Kaiser Family Foundation has a primer on the Supreme Court's review of the health-care reform law.

SOURCES: Humphrey Taylor, chairman, The Harris Poll; John Rother, president of the National Coalition on Health Care; Devon Herrick, health economist, the National Center for Policy Analysis; American Medical Association, news release, June 28, 2012; American Heart Association, news release, June 28, 2012; Associated Press; Washington Post

News Source

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Lorna Bright: My Personal Declaration of Independence

Lorna Bright: My Personal Declaration of Independence

Here we are, coming up on the Fourth of July weekend, and I have to admit that I'm thinking more about where to go to see the best fireworks than about how grateful I am to live in the land of the free and the home of the brave. At the forefront of my mind is whether or not I'll have a hotdog this weekend or I'll be a good girl and stick to my veggie diet.

Don't get me wrong. I love all of the freedoms living in a free country affords. "Live free or die!" as they say in New Hampshire. But, for me, real freedom is a very personal thing. It begins in my heart and mind. If I don't feel free, then all of the military victories ever won can't make my heart sing. If I don't believe that I'm free in every aspect of my life, all of the government decrees ever written have no meaning. We can talk about freedom on a universal level, but unless it applies to our every lives, it's just empty words.

Think about how Moses led the Hebrew people out of slavery in Egypt. He commandeered an incredibly dangerous rescue mission to get them out of there, but they still couldn't wrap their hearts and minds around the truth that they were really free. They felt lost. They felt deprived. They didn't feel free. So they wandered in the desert for 40 years!

Well, as for me, I don't want to wander through life. I want to feel free -- physically free -- like having a body that moves and grooves without any pain. I want to experience freedom -- like being financially free. And I want to talk, think and believe from a clear and honest heart and mind.

Those are some of the freedoms I want to realize in my life. And, to help me to really feel and know that I am free, totally free, in every sense of the word, I've decided to take the Declaration of Independence personally. You're free to join me, if you'd like. You're also free not to.

Here it is:

My Personal Declaration of Independence

When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one person, namely Me, to dissolve the bands which have bound me and kept me from being who I truly am and meant to be,

and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitles me, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that I should declare the causes which impel me to the separation.

I, hold these truths about myself to be self-evident, that

I am created equal, that

I am endowed by my Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that

Among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, my own awareness of the preciousness of my life and my place in this world has been instituted, deriving its powers, not from what anyone else says is true of me, but from my own firm conviction and personal consent,

That whenever any personal thought, belief or action becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of This Person to alter or to abolish such thoughts, beliefs, or actions, and to institute new thoughts, beliefs, or actions, laying their foundation on such principles and organizing my powers in such form, as seems most likely to effect my Safety and Happiness.

I, therefore, solemnly publish and declare, that I am free and independent, that I am absolved from allegiance to all that no longer is representative of my true self, and therefore, I have full power to conclude peace with myself and others, contract alliances, friendships, and relationships, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which whole and independent persons may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the guidance of divine Providence, I pledge my Life, my Fortunes and my sacred Honor.

For more by Lorna Bright, click here.

For more on mindfulness, click here.

Follow Lorna Bright on Twitter: www.twitter.com/lornabright


Source: www.huffingtonpost.com

Experimental Vaccine Seems to Stop Nicotine Addiction in Mice

Experimental Vaccine Seems to Stop Nicotine Addiction in Mice

WEDNESDAY, June 27 (HealthDay News) -- A vaccine could someday help smokers kick the habit once and for all, according to a study that found the shot successfully treated nicotine addiction in mice in just one dose.

Although the findings hold promise, experts note that research involving animals frequently fails to lead to benefits for humans. In addition, the vaccine must be tested in rats and then primates before it can be tested in humans.

The researchers who developed the vaccine, however, say it could be the strategy that finally helps millions of smokers quit.

"While we have only tested mice to date, we are very hopeful that this kind of vaccine strategy can finally help the millions of smokers who have tried to stop, exhausting all the methods on the market today but finding their nicotine addiction to be strong enough to overcome these current approaches," the study's lead investigator, Dr. Ronald Crystal, chairman and professor of genetic medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City, said in a news release.

"Smoking affects a huge number of people worldwide, and there are many people who would like to quit but need effective help," he added. "This novel vaccine may offer a much-needed solution."

The vaccine works by preventing nicotine from reaching the brain and heart. It uses the liver to continuously produce antibodies, which eat up the nicotine before it enters the bloodstream, depriving smokers of their "fix."

"As far as we can see, the best way to treat chronic nicotine addiction from smoking is to have these Pac-Man-like antibodies on patrol, clearing the blood as needed before nicotine can have any biological effect," Crystal said. "[People] will know if they start smoking again, they will receive no pleasure from it due to the nicotine vaccine, and that can help them kick the habit."

Previously tested vaccines that delivered nicotine antibodies directly failed in clinical trials because they lasted only a few weeks and had inconsistent results.

In conducting the new study, researchers engineered a nicotine antibody and inserted it into a harmless virus. The vaccine was made to target liver cells, which, in turn, produce a steady stream of the nicotine antibodies.

When used on mice, the researchers found their vaccine produced high levels of the nicotine antibody, preventing the chemical from ever reaching the brain.

The researchers said the vaccine is completely safe and may someday even be used to prevent addiction to nicotine in people who never smoked.

"Just as parents decide to give their children a [human papillomavirus] vaccine, they might decide to use a nicotine vaccine," Crystal said. "We would, of course, have to weigh benefit versus risk, and it would take years of studies to establish such a threshold."

The study is scheduled for publication June 27 in the journal Science Translational Medicine.

More information

The American Cancer Society has more about how to quit smoking.


Source: health.msn.com

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

National HIV Testing Day: 9 Reasons Not To Skip It (INFOGRAPHIC)

National HIV Testing Day: 9 Reasons Not To Skip It (INFOGRAPHIC)

RT @nba A surprise of a lifetime for a couple on their wedding day, courtesy of @KingJames. http://t.co/d0MFVlZ8

RT @noh8campaign Happy Pride! A Look at Gay Pride 2012 Around the World via @HuffingtonPost http://t.co/3Ao1gKjo #NOH8Worldwide http://t.co/F9AZxdND


Source: www.huffingtonpost.com

Weight Debate

In a bold move, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is now recommending that primary care doctors screen each and every adult patient for obesity. This means using height and weight to come up with a body mass index, or BMI.

A BMI of 30 or over is considered obese. A BMI of 25 to 30 puts you in the overweight range. Once identified, the group suggests doctors offer healthy diet programs and exercise ideas for their obese patients. Behavioral counseling may also be appropriate in some cases.

While some primary care physicians have made weight loss an important issue, this recommendation puts them right on the front line of our national weight loss war. More than one-third of adults in the U.S. are obese. The extra weight can lead to diabetes, heart problems and other health issues.

Since cardiovascular disease is the number one killer in the U.S., the task force stresses following a healthy diet and being physically active as ways to decrease the risk. Doctors orders!

I'm Dr. Cindy Haines of HealthDay TV, with the news that doctors are reading; health news that matters to you.

Credit

Weight Debate

Weight Debate

In a bold move, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is now recommending that primary care doctors screen each and every adult patient for obesity. This means using height and weight to come up with a body mass index, or BMI.

A BMI of 30 or over is considered obese. A BMI of 25 to 30 puts you in the overweight range. Once identified, the group suggests doctors offer healthy diet programs and exercise ideas for their obese patients. Behavioral counseling may also be appropriate in some cases.

While some primary care physicians have made weight loss an important issue, this recommendation puts them right on the front line of our national weight loss war. More than one-third of adults in the U.S. are obese. The extra weight can lead to diabetes, heart problems and other health issues.

Since cardiovascular disease is the number one killer in the U.S., the task force stresses following a healthy diet and being physically active as ways to decrease the risk. Doctors orders!

I'm Dr. Cindy Haines of HealthDay TV, with the news that doctors are reading; health news that matters to you.


Source: www.nlm.nih.gov

Using Herbal Remedies To Cure Acne Vulgaris

Acne vulgaris is one of the most common skin condition seen in teenagers. Though there are many treatments available to cure this condition, herbal remedies are known to yield best results among them. Original article

Monday, June 25, 2012

Food Allergy Alert

Nearly six million American children have food allergies, some life threatening. Keeping them safe after diagnosis can be a very serious challenge.

In a new study, published in the journal Pediatrics, researchers tracked 512 pre-school aged children who were diagnosed with or at risk for having an allergy to milk or eggs. 367 participants reported more than 1,000 exposures or reactions over an average 3-year period, the majority of them accidental.

Many of the families struggled with checking ingredients on food labels in their own homes. They sometimes misread labels, or weren't always vigilant enough in supervising children or preparing foods safely. About one in 10 families actually allowed their kids to try offending foods to see if they'd outgrown their allergy.

Still, more than half of the allergic reactions happened when the child was under someone else's care, either extended family, teachers or at a friend's. Only about 30-percent of severe reactions were treated with the standard epinephrine injections pointing out the need to educate families and other caretakers on when an EpiPen should be used.

The study's authors suggest improved education for both family and friends... and persistent vigilance with label reading and treatment of severe reactions.

I'm Dr. Cindy Haines of HealthDay TV, with the news that doctors are reading; health news that matters to you.

Source

Just A Little Bit Of Exercise Could Lower Your Breast Cancer Risk

Just A Little Bit Of Exercise Could Lower Your Breast Cancer Risk

Just a little bit of exercise is enough to decrease the risk of breast cancer, according to a new study.

However, University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill researchers said that the best way to lower your risk of breast cancer is to get to a healthy weight and maintain it.

The study, published in the journal CANCER, included 1,504 women who had breast cancer (233 of them had noninvasive breast cancer, while 1,271 people had invasive breast cancer), as well as 1,555 women who didn't have breast cancer. All of the women were between ages 20 and 98.

The researchers found that reproductive-age or postmenopausal women who reported exercising the most in the study -- between 10 and 19 hours each week -- were the ones who had the greatest decrease in breast cancer risk -- a 30 percent lower risk of the disease.

However, even women who exercised less than that seemed to have a decrease in breast cancer risk, especially for the hormone-receptor positive kinds of breast cancer.

And you don't have to be a marathoner or super-exerciser to reap the benefits -- researchers found that all levels of exercise intensity were linked with a decreased risk.

"The observation of a reduced risk of breast cancer for women who engaged in exercise after menopause is particularly encouraging given the late age of onset for breast cancer," study researcher Lauren McCullough said in a statement.

But the important thing is to maintain the healthy weight -- researchers found that if a woman stayed active but put on significant pounds, breast cancer risk increased -- suggesting weight gain can actually negate the positive effects of exercise.

Similarly, TIME magazine reported on a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center study showing that women who experienced a moderate weight loss -- as a result of eating healthily and exercising -- also had a decrease in hormones linked with breast cancer.

Also on HuffPost:


Source: www.huffingtonpost.com

Sunday, June 24, 2012

Effects of High Blood Pressure Drug May Mimic Celiac Disease

Effects of High Blood Pressure Drug May Mimic Celiac Disease

FRIDAY, June 22 (HealthDay News) -- A new report suggests that the common blood pressure drug olmesartan (Benicar) can cause symptoms that mimic celiac disease, leading to misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment.

It's not clear how often people who take the blood pressure-lowering drug will develop the gastrointestinal problems that are similar to those caused by celiac disease. For the moment, though, the side effects appear to be unusual, said Dr. Peter Green, director of the Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University Medical School, who was not involved with the study.

Still, Green noted, his center has seen patients who developed celiac disease-like symptoms while taking olmesartan and some have been quite ill. "One went into kidney failure and needed dialysis," he said.

According to the new study from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., 22 patients -- aged 47 to 81, average age 70 -- had symptoms of chronic diarrhea and weight loss of an average of 40 pounds. Fourteen of the patients needed to be hospitalized.

Tests showed that these patients didn't have celiac disease, a condition that causes gastrointestinal problems due to an allergy to gluten, which is found in products such as wheat and rye. However, all of the patients were taking olmesartan.

After they stopped taking the drug, all of the patients' symptoms improved; all but three went on to take other blood pressure medications.

It is not clear why the drug may cause the gastrointestinal symptoms, the study authors noted in the report published online June 21 in the Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

"These patients are usually elderly and have been on the drug for quite some time," said Green. Researchers should continue exploring the issue, he suggested.

While the study uncovered an association between celiac disease-like symptoms and use of olmesartan, it did not prove a cause-and-effect relationship.

"We thought these cases were celiac disease initially because their biopsies showed features very like celiac disease, such as inflammation," study author Dr. Joseph Murray, a Mayo Clinic gastroenterologist, said in a news release from the clinic. "What made them different was they didn't have the antibodies in their blood that are typical for celiac disease."

"It's really an awareness issue. We want doctors to be aware of this issue, so if they see a patient who is having this type of syndrome, they think about medications as a possible association," Murray said. "We've reported an association. What needs to be known next is the science to understand why there is such an association."

More information

For more on celiac disease, visit the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

SOURCES: Peter Green, M.D., director, Celiac Disease Center, and professor of clinical medicine, Columbia University Medical School, New York City; Mayo Clinic, news release, June 21, 2012; June 21, 2012, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, online


Source: health.msn.com

Young Men Taking HIV Meds May Be at Risk for Bone Loss

FRIDAY, June 22 (HealthDay News) -- Young men receiving drug treatment for HIV infection are at increased risk for low bone mass, a new study suggests.

The findings indicate that these patients should exercise, take vitamin D and be closely monitored in order to reduce their future risk of bone fractures, according to the study, released online in advance of print publication in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases.

The study included about 250 male participants, aged 14 to 25, who underwent whole-body scans to measure their bone density. Some of the men were infected with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.

The participants with HIV had been diagnosed with the infection an average of two years earlier. The HIV-infected males had an average 5 percent to 8 percent lower bone density in the hip and 2 percent to 4 percent lower bone density in the spine than those without HIV.

Although the study uncovered an association between treatment for HIV infection and lower bone density in the study participants, it did not prove a cause-and-effect relationship.

The study, funded by the U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), did not look at the causes of bone loss and cannot rule out the possibility that low bone mass was present before HIV infection.

The investigators noted that all the participants had several risk factors for bone loss, including tobacco and alcohol use and low intake of calcium and vitamin D, which is needed to absorb calcium.

"The young [HIV-positive] men in the study had been taking anti-HIV medications for a comparatively short time, yet they still had lower bone-mineral density than other men their age," study co-author Dr. Bill Kapogiannis, of the pediatric, adolescent and maternal AIDS branch of the NICHD, said in an institute news release.

"These findings suggest a short-term impact of HIV therapy on bone at ages when people are still growing and building bone mass," Kapogiannis added. "This raises concerns about the risk of fracture as they age."

Previous research in adults has indicated that there may be an association between the use of certain anti-HIV medications and an increased risk for bone fractures and bone loss, the study authors noted in the news release.

Doctors who care for young men with HIV should monitor these patients regularly for signs of bone thinning, which could predict a risk for fractures, the researchers said. Young men newly diagnosed with HIV also should exercise, quit smoking, limit alcohol consumption and get the proper amount of calcium and vitamin D.

More information

The New Mexico AIDS Education and Training Center outlines the side effects of anti-HIV drugs.

SOURCE: U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, news release, June 19, 2012

News Source

Saturday, June 23, 2012

Lion’s Mane Mushroom (Hericium erinaceus) and Nerve Regeneration

Lion’s Mane Mushroom (Hericium erinaceus) and Nerve Regeneration

With a unique flavor alternately described as lobster or shrimp, the gourmet mushroom Lion’s Mane (Hericium erinaceus) with its out-of-this-world showy display of cascading ‘teeth’ also possesses singular medicinal properties – stimulating myelin and nerve regeneration (150, 151) – which upon further study may prove beneficial in a whole series of neurological conditions. Paul Stamets suggests the possible usefulness of Hericium erinaceus extract in conditions such as Alzheimer’s, muscular dystrophy, M.S. and dementia. (134)

In the wild, Lion’s Mane Mushroom (Hericium erinaceus) grows on hardwood trees, especially oak, sycamore, maple, walnut and beech. It can be found throughout the temperate areas of the world, from North America and Europe to Japan and China.

The active compounds that have received the most attention for their nerve regenerating properties are named erinacines, a series of low molecular weight molecules that are able to pass through the blood brain barrier – an essential attribute for any medicinal compound expected to be able to effect healing on myelin or nerve tissue. (152, 153, 154)

There are currently two Japanese patents on different extracts of Hericium erinaceus. One was filed in the 1990′s for an extract named “Nerve Growth Stimulant Factor.” (150, 151) The other, filed in 2004, is for a water extraction process, yielding a product that is likewise used for nerve and myelin healing. (155)

In addition to its effect on nerve regeneration, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) also prescribes Hericium erinaceus extract for stomach and digestive conditions, as well as cancers of the digestive tract and related organs.

Modern studies have affirmed the validity of this traditional application of Hericium erinaceus extract. One paper published in 1985 reported positive findings in the treatment of atrophic gastritis. Another from 1995 concluded that Hericium erinaceus had an ameliorating effect on hepatoma with an increased life expectancy for treated patients. (156)

Note: The statements on this page have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This article is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Never use any medicinal mushroom or herb without prior approval by medical doctor.

Credit: Thank you to Paul Stamets for source material.

Dr. Rafael has been engaged in the natural health field since finishing Chiropractic College in 1996. His current focus is medicinal mushrooms, including Hericium erinaceus (more), in partnership with the U.S. company Cordyceps Reishi Extracts, LLC. To find the research references for this article, use this link to Lions Mane page and click on any number indicating a reference.


Source: www.thehealthdirectoryonline.com

Friday, June 22, 2012

Active, Outdoor Teens Are Happier Teens: Study

Active, Outdoor Teens Are Happier Teens: Study

FRIDAY, June 22 (HealthDay News) -- Teens who engaged in more moderate-to-vigorous outdoor activity reported better health and social functioning than their peers who spent hours in front of television and computer screens, a new study in Australia has found.

The teens who had the highest perceived health in the study spent an average of 2.5 hours more per day playing sports or doing other high-intensity activity than their least-active counterparts, according to the researchers.

The research, done at the University of Sydney, found that youths in the study overall spent an average of 3.3 hours a day playing video games, watching television or doing other sedentary activities, compared with only 2.1 hours in physical activity.

The findings suggest that parents need to limit how much time their children spend using electronic media, the lead author said.

"Parents should be conscious of the fact that outdoor physical activity is beneficial to their child's overall health and well-being, and should try to limit the time their child spends in front of the screen," said Bamini Gopinath, a senior research fellow at the university's Westmead Millennium Institute for Medical Research.

Although no causal link was established, the study provides "another piece of evidence" that increasing physical activity and decreasing screen time "would be beneficial" to teens, said Gopinath, adding that "the impact of activity behaviors persists over the long term."

The study, published in the July issue of Pediatrics, was conducted from 2004 to 2009.

Study questionnaires asked how much time 1,216 teens spent on outdoor exercise compared to indoor activities including computer use for recreation and homework. Other sedentary activities such as reading were included. The data were collected at age 12, and again five years later. At that time, another group of 475 teenagers was recruited from the same schools in the Sydney area. Both groups responded to items about their health and general well-being.

The questionnaire included 23 items about the teens' health and physical functioning, as well as self-esteem, peer relationships and school.

Not surprisingly, more time spent reading and doing homework was associated with better school performance.

The more-active teens had significantly better scores relating to social functioning, or getting along with peers. Teens "who rarely exercised" were more likely to report "feelings of loneliness and shyness."

"Improved understanding of these relationships could help in developing interventions to promote general well-being among adolescents," the study authors concluded.

Another expert said he wasn't surprised by the findings.

"It makes sense that these kids who are getting outside, playing sports and running around are going to feel better than those kids who are sitting alone with a screen," said Dr. Michael Rich, director of the Center on Media and Child Health at Boston Children's Hospital.

He cautioned against "over-interpreting" the results because other factors not looked at in the study "may have more influence." For example, he noted that the study did not show whether some teens avoided outdoor sports because they were less healthy to begin with.

But the findings are "worth paying attention to," Rich said.

It also makes sense that kids who spend their time "running around in the fresh air" and playing sports are going to be "not only physically healthier, but socially healthier because they're learning to work things through with other teens," he said.

The study gave "more objective data that supports what your mom always said, which is 'go outside and play,' proving mom was right," Rich added.

More information

To learn more about children and physical exercise, visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

SOURCES: Bamini Gopinath, Ph.D., senior research fellow, Westmead Millennium Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Australia; Michael Rich, M.D., director, Center on Media and Child Health, Boston Children's Hospital; July 2012, Pediatrics


Source: health.msn.com

Kidney Disease May Be as Harmful to Heart as Heart Attack: Study

TUESDAY, June 19 (HealthDay News) -- People with chronic kidney disease may have the same level of risk for coronary heart disease as people who have previously had a heart attack, a new study suggests.

It has long been known that chronic kidney disease patients are at increased risk for heart attacks, but this is the first study to show that their risk for heart disease may be as high as heart attack survivors.

For the study, researchers compared the incidence of heart attacks and death among 1.3 million people in Canada with chronic kidney disease, diabetes, previous heart attack or a combination of these risk factors.

The risk of heart attack among people with chronic kidney disease, diabetes or both was comparable to that of people who previously had a heart attack, found lead researcher Dr. Marcello Tonelli, of the University of Alberta, and colleagues.

The findings, published online June 19 in the journal The Lancet, suggest that kidney disease could be used to help identify people at risk for coronary heart disease.

"Our research suggests that there is a strong case for considering chronic kidney disease to be a coronary heart disease risk equivalent, meaning people with chronic kidney disease are at a comparable risk of coronary events to those who have previously had a heart attack," Tonelli said in a journal news release.

"Chronic kidney disease patients have substantially higher rates of death from heart disease after a heart attack than the general population, which emphasizes the potential value of preventing coronary events through drug treatment and lifestyle interventions," Tonelli said. "The rate of death from heart disease among people with chronic kidney disease was similar to or higher than the rate of death among people with diabetes -- in whom the value of preventive treatments is well known."

The study findings need to be interpreted with caution, George Bakris, of the University of Chicago, noted in an accompanying editorial. Although the study was large, there was no information about patients' medication use or other factors such as blood pressure.

Because of this, the results do not "support classification of chronic kidney disease as a coronary heart disease risk equivalent," Bakris wrote in the editorial.

More information

The National Kidney Foundation has more about chronic kidney disease.

Original Source

Thursday, June 21, 2012

Adding Nevirapine to HIV Regimen Halves Newborn Transmission Rate

Embargoed for Release
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
5 p.m. EDT

Adding the drug nevirapine to the regimen given to newborns of women diagnosed with HIV shortly before or during labor halves the newborns' risk of contracting the virus, according to findings by a National Institutes of Health research network.

The researchers found that the rate of mother-to-child HIV transmission around the time of delivery was 2.2 percent among infants who received the standard drug zidovudine combined with nevirapine, compared with 4.8 percent among infants treated with zidovudine alone.

The researchers also found a reduced rate of transmission (2.4 percent) among infants treated with a three-drug combination: zidovudine, nelfinavir and lamivudine. However, infants given the two-drug combination were less likely to have neutropenia than were those on the three drug regimen. (Neutropenia is a blood disorder consisting of low levels of neutrophils, a type of infection fighting white blood cell.) The two drug combination is also less expensive and easier to administer than the three drug combination.

“Pregnant women who don't know they have HIV or those who don’t come in for prenatal care may not get the early treatment needed to keep the virus from being passed on to the baby,” said study author Heather Watts, M.D., of the Pediatric, Adolescent and Maternal AIDS Branch at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). “Our findings show that even in these situations, many, many infant cases of HIV can be prevented with the two drug combination treatment.”

First author Karin Nielsen-Saines, M.D., of the University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine conducted the research with Dr. Mofenson and 25 colleagues at the NICHD and 17 other hospitals and research institutions in Argentina, Brazil, South Africa and the United States. The researchers conducted the study as part of the NICHD- and NIAID-funded International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group (IMPAACT) and its predecessor networks, the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) and the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG). Additional support for IMPAACT was provided by NIH's National Institute of Mental Health.

Their findings appear in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study included more than 1,600 infants born between 2004 and 2010.All had received one of three treatments:

  • the standard twice daily zidovudine alone for six weeks,
  • twice daily zidovudine for six weeks plus three doses of nevirapine in the first six days after birth
  • twice daily zidovudine for six weeks plus two weeks of treatment with nelfinavir and lamivudine. Newborns are most susceptible to HIV in the two weeks following birth.

To reduce the risk of HIV transmission through breast milk, mothers were counseled to formula feed their infants. The researchers tested the infant's HIV status at three months. About 8 percent of all the infants were HIV positive.

Within 48 hours after birth, the researchers tested the infants for HIV. Overall, about 6 percent tested positive, indicating that infection occurred before birth.

The researchers calculated the overall infection rates for all the infants in the study — those infected at birth, and later, after 6 weeks of treatment.In addition to acquiring HIV during their time in the womb, infants may also become infected during the labor and delivery process. The study evaluated the effectiveness of the treatments in reducing HIV transmission during this latter interval (intrapartum transmission).; So the researchers calculated the transmission rate around the time of delivery — the proportion of infections among infants who tested negative at birth, but later tested positive after six weeks of treatment. In the different drug treatment groups, infection rates were 7.1 percent in the zidovudine-nevirapine group (which had a 2.2 percent transmission rate), 7.4 percent in the three-drug arm (which had a 2.4 percent transmission rate), and 11 percent in the zidovudine-only group (which had a 4.8 percent transmission rate).

The researchers also found that mothers with more severe HIV infections were more likely to transmit HIV to their infants than were other mothers in the study. Illegal drug use during pregnancy also increased the transmission rate.

“The two-drug combination is relatively easy to administer and well tolerated by the babies,” Dr. Watts said. “Now that this alternative has been shown to be effective, it is increasingly being adopted worldwide to prevent transmission in these high-risk situations.”

About the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD): The NICHD sponsors research on development, before and after birth; maternal, child, and family health; reproductive biology and population issues; and medical rehabilitation. For more information, visit the Institute’s website at http://www.nichd.nih.gov/.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit www.nih.gov.

NIH...Turning Discovery Into Health


Source

The Decline In Aged Care Standards And Risks To Future Generations

The Decline In Aged Care Standards And Risks To Future Generations

The decline in aged care standards reflects upon more than just the lack of health care and creative solutions for the nation’s elderly. It is a mark upon the generations that follow and a sign of a things to come. While many families are unsure of what to do with aging parents, full time jobs, and family obligations the end results are not necessarily what these families had in mind.

For the quality caring of the elderly the entire system must change. Right now the hallways of facilities and the insurance company restrictions are loaded with patients who desperately need much more than what they are being given. Beds are not clean. Meals are not adequate. Men and women who have served their country and their neighbors in more ways than one are now left without their medical and social needs met.

Warehousing of people causes a greater effect on health, mental acuity, and life expectancy. It leads to depression of the staff as well as the patients. The current regulations create a systematic grouping of people that determines the level of quality they receive. This applies not only to facilities but to the entire system of medical as well as social service qualifications.

Outside of facilities many of today’s elderly face the same issues. They can not qualify for transportation to and from their medical visits and they can not rely solely on volunteer organizations for food, clothing, and medication. Without insurance approval they can not receive in home help that will provide for their needs or give them the ability to stay in their homes independently.

When the cost of living is factored into the equation the picture becomes even more distressing. The Social Security freeze and the lack of disposable income from pensions and retirement savings is definitely taking a huge toll on this segment of society. Without the funds to pay for medications and food the applications for residential facilities are pouring in faster each year. There is not enough room for the number of patients that are waiting to get in and in the meantime they are running out of money.

What can be done about this situation? Improvements throughout the generalized medical and social systems could carry a huge impact on the next generation, and the ones following that. It has been suggested that the regulations are aimed at protecting the insurance companies by politicians who use the bad mark on society as an election platform.

Insurance companies hold the key to providing better coverage for the aging population so they can afford their medications, afford to eat, and afford to maintain their life. The rest of the problem goes much deeper than that.

In order to change the decline in aged care standards the entire community needs to become more creative and considerate within their activities. Advocacy for better inspection standards and involvement in mentally and socially valuable activities is just the beginning. Creative solutions will include a change in attitude toward the aging population. The generations that will follow today’s level of promise is not looking forward to a better situation. Until everyone comes together and demands respect and real change for the elderly the problems of today will only carry over into tomorrow.

Visit our site for details about the decline in aged care Queensland standards, now. You can also find information about a friendly assisted living community, today.


Source: www.thehealthdirectoryonline.com

Extra Treatment during Prolapse Repair Reduces Incontinence Rate

Embargoed for Release
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
5 p.m. EDT

Surgery to repair pelvic organ prolapse often carries a risk of incontinence. To avoid scheduling a second surgery, some women may opt to have a second procedure to reduce incontinence at the time of their prolapse repair surgery.

A study funded by the National Institutes of Health has found that although the surgery — to support the urethra with a sling — reduces the rate of incontinence, it also carries the risk for such complications as difficulty emptying the bladder, urinary tract infection, bladder perforation, and bleeding.

The study authors concluded that, when deciding whether to have the second procedure at the same time as the first, women and their physicians consider the potential benefits together with the potential risks of having the two procedures at the same time.

Pelvic organ prolapse occurs when muscles and tissues in the pelvic cavity weaken. The muscles and tissues span the lower pelvic cavity, holding such organs as the bladder, uterus and colon in place. With the weakening, the organs slump into the pelvic cavity, pressing into the vagina. In severe cases, the vagina is inverted, and vaginal tissue protrudes out of the body. As the pelvic organs shift, they can push the urethra out of place and alter the shape of the bladder. Prolapse repair surgery relieves the pressure on the lower pelvic cavity, but sometimes urinary incontinence develops. To reduce the risk of incontinence, the sling is threaded under the urethra and attached to the abdominal wall.

One in five women will have surgery to correct this condition in her lifetime, according to the study authors. Of the estimated 200,000 women who undergo surgery each year, about 25 percent become incontinent following surgery.

"The idea has been that inserting a bladder sling — in conjunction with vaginal surgery to correct prolapse — would reduce incontinence and avoid the need for a second surgery," said Susan F. Meikle, M.D., MSPH, of the Contraception and Reproductive Health Branch of the NIH’s Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and Program Director of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. "The study found that inserting the bladder sling may lead to complications. Although these complications can be treated, it may also make sense to wait for symptoms to appear before inserting the bladder sling."

In addition to the NICHD, the NIH Office of Research on Women's Health also supported the study.

The study's first author, John T. Wei, M.D., M.S., of the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor, conducted the study with Dr. Meikle and collaborators in the NICHD-supported Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.

Previously, Network studies reported on the frequency of pelvic disorders, including prolapse, among U.S. women and described how another kind of secondary procedure during abdominal prolapse surgery can reduce incontinence.

The findings appear in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The randomized study involved 337 who were treated surgically for prolapse. The women were in their early 60s, on average. Half of the women received a urethral sling at the time of their prolapse repair surgery to reduce the chance of incontinence after the pelvic organs are returned to a more normal position.

Pelvic organ prolapsed before and after surgery.

From left to right: Pelvic organ prolapse before surgery, pelvic organ prolapsed after surgical correction, and corrected pelvic organ prolapse with urethral sling.Illustrations courtesy of Jasmine Tan-Kim, M.D.

The researchers analyzed the rate of incontinence in the two groups. Within three months of surgery, researchers diagnosed incontinence in 24 percent of the women. The researchers found twice as many cases (49 percent) occurred among women with no sling. After 12 months had passed, 27 percent of the sling group had developed incontinence or been treated for it, compared with 43 percent in the no-sling group.

But the sling group was more likely to experience complications of surgery, the researchers found. These included urinary tract infections, major bleeding, bladder perforations, and difficulty emptying the bladder. In 2 percent of cases, women required additional surgery to take out the sling. In the group that did not receive a sling, about 5 percent of the women underwent additional surgery within a year to have a sling put in place.

Some doctors conduct a simple test to predict if a woman is likely to develop incontinence after prolapse repair surgery. Typically, a woman is asked to cough or mimic as sneeze when her bladder is full and the uterus is re-positioned to the top of the vaginal cavity. The logic of the test is that, if urine escapes, then incontinence is likely to result after the surgery.

About the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD): The NICHD sponsors research on development, before and after birth; maternal, child, and family health; reproductive biology and population issues; and medical rehabilitation. For more information, visit the Institute's website at http://www.nichd.nih.gov/.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit www.nih.gov.

NIH...Turning Discovery Into Health


News Source